DEFINITION OF CONTINUITY OF A FUNCTION AT A POINT. A function

is said to be continuous a point

if
(a)

is defined at

,
and
(b)


A function

is continuous at

if for every

there is a

such that
![]()
EXAMPLE 1. Constant functions are continuous everywhere. If

for all

,
then

for every

,
so

is continuous everywhere.
EXAMPLE 2. The identity function is continuous everywhere. If

for all

we have

for every

,
so the identity function is continuous everywhere.
EXAMPLE 3. Let

for all

This function is continuous at every point

which is not an integer. At the integers it is discontinuous, since the limit
of

does not exist, the right and left-hand limits being unequal. A discontinuity
of this type, where the right- and left-hand limits exist but are unequal, is
called a jump discontinuity.
EXAMPLE 4. The function

for which

for

,
,
is discontinuous at

.
We say there is an infinite discontinuity at

because the function takes arbitrarily large values near

EXAMPLE 5. Let

for

.
This function is continuous everywhere except at

.
It is discontinuous at

because

is not equal to the limit of

as

.
In this example, the discontinuity could be removed by redefining the function
at

to have the value

instead of

.
For this reason, a discontinuity of this type is called a removable
discontinuity. Note that jump discontinuities, such as those possessed by the
greatest-integer function, cannot be removed by simply changing the value of
fat one point.
Calculations with limits may often be simplified by the use of the following theorem which provides basic rules for operating with limits.
Theorem. Let

and

be functions such that

Then we have
(i)

(ii)

(iii)
(iv)
if

Proofs of (i) and (ii). Since the two statements

are equivalent, and since we have
![]()
it suffices to prove part (i) of the theorem when the limits

and

are both zero. Suppose, then, that

and

as

.
We shall prove that

as

.
This means we must show that for every

there is a

such that
![]()
Let

be given. Since

as

,
there is a

such that
![]()
Similarly,

as

,
there is a

such that
![]()
If we let

denote the smaller of the two numbers

and

,
then the above two inequalities are valid if

and hence, by the triangle inequality, we find that

This proves (i). The proof of (ii) is entirely similar, except that the last
step we use the inequality
![]()
Proof of (iii). Suppose that we have proved part (iii) for the special case in
which one the limits is

.
Then the general case follows easily from this special case. In fact, all we
need to do is write
![]()
The special case implies that each term on the right approaches

as

and, by property (i), the sum of the two terms also approaches

.
Therefore, it remains to prove (iii) in the special case where one of the
limits, say

,
is

.
Suppose, then, that

and

as

.
We wish to prove that

as

To do this we must show that if a positive

is given, there is a

such that
![]()
Since

as

,
there is a

such that
![]()
For such

,.
we have
![]()
and hence
![]()
Since

as

,
for every

there is a

such that

Therefore, if we let

be the smaller of the two numbers

and

,
then both inequalities are valid whenever

,
and for such

we deduce the desired inequality
![]()
This completes the proof of (iii).
Proof of (iv). Since the quotient

is the product of

with

,
it suffices to prove that

as

and then appeal to (iii). Let

.
Then

as

,
and we wish to prove that

as

.
Let

be given. We must show that there is a

such that

The
difference to be estimated may be written as follows.

Since

as

,
we can choose a

such that both inequalities

are
satisfied whenever

.
The second of these inequalities implies

so

for such x. Using this in

along
with the inequality

,
we obtain

This
completes the proof of (iv).