Let

be a composition of two functions

and

,
say

for all

in some interval

If we know the derivative of

,
say

the chain rule tells us that the derivative of

is given by the formula

Since

,
this states that

.
In other words,

implies

In Leibniz notation, this statement can be written as follows: If we have the
integration formula

then we have also have the more general formula

For example, if

then

holds with

so

becomes

In particular, if

this gives us

a result that is easily verified directly since the derivative of

is

.
We notice that the general formula in

is related to

by a simple mechanical process. Suppose we replace

everywhere in

by a new symbol

and replace

by

,
the Leibniz notation for derivatives. Then it becomes

At this stage the temptation is strong to replace the combination

by

.
If we do the last formula becomes

Notice that this has exactly the same form as

except that the symbol

appears everywhere instead of

.
In other words, every integration formula such as

can be yield a more general integration formula if we simply substitute
symbols. We replace in

by a new symbol

to obtain

and then we think of

as representing a new function of

,
say

.
Then we replace the symbol

by the combination

and equation

reduces to the general formula in

For example, if we replace

by

in the formula

we obtain

In this latter formula,

may be replaced by

and

by

,
and a correct integration formula,

results.
When this mechanical process is used in reverse, it becomes the
method of integration by substitution. The object of the
method is to transform an integral with a complicated integrand, such as

,
into a more familiar integral, such as

.
The method is applicable whenever the original integral can be written in the
form

since the substitution

transforms this to

If we succeed in carrying out the integration indicated by

,
we obtain a primitive, say

,
and then the original integral may be evaluated by replacing

by

in the formula for

EXAMPLE 1. Integrate

Solution. Let us keep in mind that we are trying to write

in the form

with a suitable choice of

and

.
Since

is a composition, this suggests that we take

and

so

becomes

This choice of

gives

,
and hence

.
The extra factor

is easily taken care of by multiplying and dividing the integrand by

.
Thus we have

Now, we make the substitution

,

,
and obtain

Replacing

by

in the end result, we obtain the formula

which can be verified directly by differentiation. After a little practice one
can perform some of the above steps mentally, and the entire calculation can
be given more briefly as follows: Let

.
Then

,
and we obtain

Notice that the method works in this example because the factor

has an exponent one less than the power of

which appears in

.
EXAMPLE 2. Integrate

.
Solution. Let

Then

and we get

Again, the final result is easily verified by differentiation.
EXAMPLE 3. Integrate

.
Solution. Let

Then

or

Hence

EXAMPLE 4. Integrate

Solution. Let

Then

so

and
we obtain

The method of substitution is, of course, also applicable to definite integrals.
EXAMPLE 5. Evaluate

Solution. Let

Then

,
so that

Now we obtain new limits of integration by noting that

when

and that

when

Then
we write

The same result is arrived at by expressing everything in terms of

.
Thus we have

Now we prove a general theorem which justifies the process used in Example 5.
THEOREM SUBSTITUTION THEOREM FOR INTEGRALS. Assume

has a continuous derivative

on an open interval

.
Let

be the set of values taken by

on

and assume that

is continuous on

.
Then for each

and

in

,
we have

Proof. Let

and define two new functions

and

as follows:

Since

and

are indefinite integrals of continuous functions they have derivatives given
by the formulas

Now, let

denote the composite function,

Using the chain rule, we find

Applying the second fundamental theorem twice, we obtain

and

This shows that the two integrals are equal.

In order to find

,
the integration by parts formula follows the steps






to obtain

A moment's reflection shows that the result was obtained by taking successive
derivatives of

and taking successive integrals of

and combine the result as indicated below:

The procedure can be justified from


where



In view of the above formula we see that if

is a polynomial of degree

then



The integration by parts formula yields

Thus if

,
then the polynomial

is obtained from the previous polynomial

by multiplying by

and adding the term

Exercise: Build up the following table of coefficients for the

Exercise: Compute

for


It is clear now that if

is a polynomial of degree

then



,


a. Compute

for

b. Write down the reduction formula for

and

c. Compute the polynomials appeared in

and in

for

a. Establish the identity

b. Set

,

.
Show that

c. List the coefficients of

for

d. Draw the graphs of

,

,

on the square

e. Calculate the coefficients

in the expansion

for

f. Find the coefficients

in the integral

for



a. Establish the identities


b. Deduce from the identities





c. Compute the coefficients

and

in the expansions


for

d. Compute

for



The reduction formula follows from


Hence




For even

,
write

to reduce it to

and expand the binomial expression. For odd

,
set

,

and when

appears, use the identity

Example. Find

.
Write

,


,



Therefore

and
so
